Courtesy of a $45 million Pentagon terror aid package, African peacekeepers fighting al-Qaida’s allies in Somalia are about to get their first drones - the hand-launched Raven RQ-11. Spencer Ackerman over at Wired's Danger room blog, explains:
But neither the U.S. military nor the CIA will be flying the four-pound, hand-launched Raven. Instead, some of the 1200 peacekeepers from both nations manning checkpoints and patrolling the streets of Mogadishu will be its operators. They’ll likely be using it in the same way U.S. soldiers and Marines flew the Raven in Afghanistan and Iraq: for aerial recon over the city, to trace al-Shabaab’s movement of fighters and weapons through the Somali capitol. (No missile strikes from the small drones, in other words.) That’s consistent with the “outsourced” approach the U.S. has adopted to confront al-Shabaab. Although outsourcing has its limits, as when an occasional mystery airstrike slams a convoy of militants. The whole idea behind the Ravens is to allow small units to rapidly acquire and act on their own overhead intelligence without going through the cumbersome military bureaucracy necessary to fly larger, more expensive spy aircraft. But neither nation’s forces have used small drones before. And the first Marine battalions to use Ravens in Iraq found them underwhelming.We don't know about those American soldiers in that "underwhelming" video, but the R-Q 11 replica built according to spec by the nitroplane guys in the clip below flies just fine, and the footage obtained is captivating.
Army Times adds that part of the $45 million aid package also includes goodies for the following African al-Qaida-challenged countries:
...funding a number of other North African countries, including several where there is a continuing terror threat from al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb. The plan includes:Speaking of an ever expanding drone warfare and the whole White House vs. U.S Congress debate over whether or not what the US is doing in Libya constitutes a war not approved by congress, Matt Yglesias over at Think Progress' pointed out:
• $22.6 million for Mauritania for a turbo prop aircraft for troop transport and surveillance, and necessary maintenance and training; and $8.1 million for airfield systems and construction and communications equipment to develop a forward operating base in the country.
• $17.7 million for an aircraft for Djibouti, where the U.S. has its only Africa military base.
• $12.1 million for helicopter upgrades and training for Kenya.
• $1 million for Mali for mine detector kits.
...Part of what the White House is saying about the War Powers issue seems to rely on the idea that it makes a big difference if you're not dispatching actual human beings into an area of armed conflict. After all, everyone recognizes the difference between participating in a war and providing military equipment to someone. And a drone is just that, a piece of equipment rather than a soldier.The Atlantic's Ta-Nehesi Coates concluded:
I understand this from the perspective of making an argument to Congress and the American people. But there's implicit message here to the rest of the world. Perhaps Americans don't consider it war, unless actual American soldiers are endangered. But why should, say, these guys draw the same conclusion? I assure you if I were in Libya and my baby sister was killed by a NATO bombing, I would conclude, whatever my hatred of Gaddafi, that America was at war with me, that it had, indeed, commenced hostilities. I don't think I'd be wrong in that.pic: ISAFMedia























